Topic
205 articles found
You know the pattern. You open a fresh Claude Code session, paste in the task, and the first few responses are sharp. Claude reads the right files, makes sensible decisions, and follows your architecture conventions. Then - somewhere around the 45-minute mark - things start to drift. It asks about a
Turns out the guy who built it knows a thing or two.
Claude Code Integration, Token Burn Analysis & Qwen2-VL Fine-tuning Insights Today's Highlights This week features practical Claude developer tooling with physical hardware integration, a deep dive into Claude's token consumption and cost implications, and experiences fine-tuning Qwen2-VL on AMD MI3
Well, at least it can color in between the lines just fine.
Anthropic has introduced auto mode in Claude Code, enabling multi-step software development workflows with reduced manual intervention. The feature combines automated execution with layered safety mechanisms, including input filtering, action evaluation, and two-stage classification, while maintaini
Improve Claude Code performance by having it validate its own work The post How to Make Claude Code Validate its own Work appeared first on Towards Data Science.
Most LLM coding tools live inside a single editor session. They suggest, complete, and refactor inside one file at a time. That is useful, but it is not where real product engineering happens. Real engineering spans ticket breakdown, cross-repository implementation, code review, merge request manage
If you have spent any real time with Claude Code, you have probably noticed the same problem I did. You write the same instructions in the prompt every other day. "Use four-space indentation here." "Always run the linter after edits." "Format commit messages this way." After the third or fourth repe
Claude Code is faster when it remembers past decisions, not just the files in front of it.
A new open-source script swaps Claude Code's expensive Anthropic backend for DeepSeek V4 Pro, OpenRouter, or Fireworks AI—keeping the agent loop, slashing the bill.
Turns out the real agent was the subagents we made along the way.
Abstract: This article walks through configuring both Claude Code (terminal CLI) and Claude Desktop (Cowork) to use Amazon Bedrock as the inference backend — no Anthropic API key or subscription required. Claude Code needs two environment variables in ~/.claude/settings.json. Claude Desktop needs a
I read Nate Herk's "I Tried 100+ Claude Code Skills. These 6 Are The Best" today. He converged on 6 meta-tools (Skill Creator, Superpowers, GSD, Context Mode, Claude Mem, plus Frontend Design as a bonus) for the agency dev who builds automations for clients. I converged on a different 6 — for the in
I'm not an engineer. I'm a non-developer who decided, in late 2025, that I wanted Claude Code to keep working when I was asleep. Six months later, that decision compiled into 857 autonomous sessions, 840 self-merged pull requests, and 17,328 evolution cycles distributed across 49 launchd services —
Claude Code's --dangerously-skip-permissions flag skips per-action approvals — a real productivity boost. The downside: with permissions skipped, Claude can read everything in your home directory, run any command, and modify any file outside your project. The claude-pod is a small, unofficial Docker
llms.txt is a small text file on a documentation site—usually lists what the product is and links to the important Markdown pages. For coding agents, treat it as the canonical URL to open first when upstream behavior is unclear. This post is mostly setup and workflow, not theory. Location Put this t
Local LLMs are great, when you know what tasks suit them best
I still remember the message. A developer on my team - sharp, careful - pinged me: "My Claude Code bill spiked $200 this week. Same workflow. Something's off." I had no answer. The built-in usage view showed session totals. The web billing page showed monthly aggregates. But neither could answer the
Stop Trusting Your AI-Generated Tests: Hardening Codebases with PITest and Claude Code Agentic Loops In 2026, generating code is the easy part, but verifying that your AI-generated tests actually test something is the new engineering bottleneck. If you're still relying on Line Coverage as your prima
After 14 months of iterative testing across 3 distinct engineering teams, we measured a 62% reduction in code review cycle time, 41% drop in post-release production bugs, and $127k annual infrastructure savings by integrating Claude Code into our core development workflow—all while maintaining 100%
